Connect with us


Why Sonic the Hedgehog 2’s Reviews Are so Mixed | Screen Rant

Katelyn Bailey



The Sonic the Hedgehog 2 reviews are in, and most critics are ambivalent on the classic video game character’s second outing on the big screen, leading to mixed reviews. Following the somewhat surprising success of the first movie, Sonic the Hedgehog 2 seeks to make the transition into a full-blown franchise with a third movie and a Knuckles spin-off already in the works. The reviews suggest that much of the first Sonic the Hedgehog movie’s appeal is still there, but there are some issues the filmmakers could address in future installments.

Sonic the Hedgehog 2 sees the return of the Ben Schwartz-voiced Sonic as well as Jim Carrey’s Dr. Robotnik and James Marsden from the 2020 movie. While many audiences had trepidation about the first Sonic movie, especially after early trailers with a bizarre CGI Sonic design, Sonic the Hedgehog ended up being fairly well-received and made over $300 million at the box office, earning it a rare video game movie sequel. The sequel fully introduces Sonic’s long-time sidekick Tails and his rival Knuckles, voiced by Colleen O’Shaughnessey and Idris Elba, respectively.

RELATED: Sonic 2 Post-Credits Scene & Sequel Villain Setup Explained

As of this writing, Sonic the Hedgehog 2 has a 64% ranking on Rotten Tomatoes and a 45 on Metacritic. Metacritic lists most of its reviews as mixed, suggesting that most critics are lukewarm instead of being sharply divided. The overall impression is that Sonic the Hedgehog 2 is a competently made movie that offers little surprises or divergences from the family action-adventure film genre.

The Hollywood Reporter

Overstuffed with frantic action and framed by Sonic’s wisecracking commentary, Sonic the Hedgehog 2 will appeal to family audiences seeking holiday distractions even if it doesn’t break new ground elaborating the franchise’s sprawling universe of intersecting characters and plotlines.”

The Guardian

There’s not much to spoil about Sonic the Hedgehog 2 because there’s not very much to say about it, other than it’s mildly amusing and reasonably competently assembled.

The Wrap

“Proof that one can elevate a mostly disposable franchise investing in the casting and screenplay, ‘Sonic the Hedgehog 2’ doesn’t harbor any illusions of being a beacon of cinema, but within its department as ‘the harmless option for family viewing during Spring Break,’it offers enough surprises to more pleasant than unbearable.”

Critics have generally been positive about the performances in Sonic the Hedgehog 2. Ben Schwartz and Jim Carrey’s comedic chops are described as anchoring the film, and Elba has been praised for his straightforward but still humorous take on Knuckles. Sonic the Hedgehog 2‘s action sequences have also generally received praise for their pace and use of color.

Paste Magazine

Elba makes an immediately punishing impact as a Drax the Destroyer-inspired Knuckles—an almighty warrior with blunt smarts and fist-first reactions. Longtime voice of Tails, O’Shaughnessey’s command over the sidekick connects with the nostalgia for the beloved character.”

The Washington Post

There’s no denying that kids will delight in ‘Sonic 2’s’ zany antics, explosive set pieces and commendable lessons. Older viewers should get a kick out of the punning dialogue and meta-humor, which wryly calls out homages to Batman, Ghostbusters and Indiana Jones.”

The Times (UK)

It’s still sugar-rush silly, and Colleen O’Shaughnessey is underemployed as Tails the flying fox. Yet there’s fun to be had watching Jim Carrey voyage into the far reaches of ham as evil Dr Robotnik, whose facial hair has reached epic proportions.

On the other hand, many critics are bemoaning the movie’s length and criticizing its pacing. In comparison with the tightly-paced 100-minute original, Sonic the Hedgehog 2 is seen as overly stuffed and wearing out its welcome. Some reviewers have also criticized the sequel’s jokes and its fairly simple storyline without much larger meaning.


An hour and a half would’ve been a perfectly fine run time, whereas at two hours and change, ‘Sonic 2’ wears out its welcome well before it turns into yet another phone-it-in franchise entry — the kind where storms gather, a column of fluorescent light shoots up to the sky and everything becomes apocalyptic.

The Independent

I’m sure this all makes perfect sense to hardcore fans of the Sonic games, but the film has no idea how to structure these references in a way that feels legible to a general audience.

Screen Daily

For a film about a character who is incredibly speedy, this sequel feels behind the curve, chasing after blockbuster trends but only falling farther behind.”

From these reviews, it seems safe to say that Sonic the Hedgehog 2 is more of the same as the first movie, for better and for worse. It has received more positive reviews than Morbius and Fantastic Beasts: The Secret of Dumbledore, the month’s other two major franchise releases, but seems unlikely to appear on many critics’ year-end best-of lists. Still, reviews suggest that those who enjoyed the first Sonic the Hedgehog movie and the franchise as a whole will likely enjoy the second outing.

Next: Sonic 2 & 3 Are Too Early For Those Shadow Theories To Come True

Original Article:


John Krasinski Finally Breaks Silence After Doctor Strange 2 Cameo

Katelyn Bailey



Contains Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness spoilers!

John Krasinski finally breaks his silence following his cameo appearance in Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness. The latest Marvel Studios movie to hit theaters released on May 6, and has quickly proven a hit at the box office, grossing over $700 million worldwide so far. Doctor Strange 2 reviews have been positive, though there are some elements that have dominated the conversation around the movie online.

One of those has been the movie’s approach to cameos, which, thanks to the prominence of the multiverse plotline, had been the subject of much fan speculation. In the Doctor Strange 2 Illuminati scene, one of the most popular fan theories ended up coming true, with Krasinski appearing as Earth-838’s version of Reed Richards, a.k.a. Mr. Fantastic. Since Marvel announced an MCU Fantastic Four movie was in development, viewers have been waiting for when the franchise would make take the first step towards introducing them, making this fancast-come-true a big moment for many audience members.

Related: Doctor Strange 2 Cast Guide: Every Marvel Character Who Appears

Now, Krasinski breaks his silence with his first tweet since Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness released. The actor remains extremely coy, however, revealing that he just wrapped on a movie and finally has some free time. He asks his followers if there’s anything out he should see, and a wink is heavily implied. Check out Krasinski’s tweet below:

Click here to see the original post

As happy as many were to finally see Reed Richards in an MCU movie, his 838 variant met a violent end at the hands of the Scarlet Witch, which has many questioning what Krasinski’s Doctor Strange 2 Mr. Fantastic cameo means the first. For many, bringing in an actor this big has to suggest he is intended to return in Fantastic Four, but given the nature of the multiverse, this is not necessarily the case. In Spider-Man: No Way Home, for example, the three Peter Parker variants are played by different actors, meaning this could have been Kevin Feige & Co. winking good at a popular fan-cast.

Bringing back Patrick Stewart to play Doctor Strange 2‘s Professor X in the same scene seems to support this, since the actor’s age and long history with the part would make it a surprise if he was intended to headline the MCU X-Men. However, given that all of the variants Doctor Strange and Wanda encountered were played by their respective MCU actors, the long-term potential remains a possibility, if not a certainty. Krasinski opted not to break the news with his first post-release tweet, but that fans are likely to keep a close eye on his feed from now on anyway.

Next: Doctor Strange In The Multiverse Of Madness Ending Explained (In Detail)

Source: John Krasinski/Twitter

Original Post:

Continue Reading


Absolute Bluetooth Volume on Android Explained & How to Disable It

Katelyn Bailey



Absolute Bluetooth Volume allows Android users to control both the volume of the Bluetooth device they’re connecting to and the volume of the phone with one volume control. This feature has been around since 2015, and it is likely already available on your phone. There are pros and cons to Absolute Bluetooth Volume, and there is also an easy way to turn it off.

Bluetooth is a useful feature in itself, although the need for better controls has become even greater in recent times with so many devices moving away from physical ports. This is particularly true when it comes to headphones, with the 3.5mm port becoming less common and forcing users to rely more heavily on wireless headphones. Absolute Bluetooth Volume was a long-awaited feature on Android devices. Prior to its inclusion in Android, Bluetooth devices required the user to control the volume of the accessory and the phone volume separately.

Related: Google’s Push For Tablet-Optimized Android Apps Is Too Little, Too Late

Absolute Bluetooth Volume is a feature that is available for devices running on Android 6.0 or later. According to the Android Open Source Project, it allows the phone to send audio information through the phone, edits that audio information to match the volume, and then controls the volume of the Bluetooth device to make sure accurate volume is achieved. While the source device can detect changes and change volume coming from the Android device, changes to the source device can also be shown in the volume controls on the Android device. Confused? Here’s what it all boils down to: If someone turns down the volume on a Bluetooth speaker/headphones while it’s connected to your phone, you’ll be able to see the new volume reflected in the controls of your phone.

Unfortunately, many Bluetooth-enabled devices aren’t designed to handle Absolute Bluetooth Volume. As such, some may encounter audio issues when Absolute Bluetooth Volume is enabled. If you find that your Bluetooth device is having volume problems when connected to your Android phone, disabling Absolute Bluetooth Volume might do the trick.

First, open the Settings app on your Android phone, scroll to the bottom of the page, and tap ‘System.’ Next, tap ‘Developer Options,’ scroll down the page, and look for the option titled, ‘Enable absolute volume.’ Tap that, and you’ll disable Absolute Bluetooth Volume on your Android device. If you ever find yourself wanting to re-enable Absolute Bluetooth Volume, follow these steps again to turn the feature back on.

Absolute Bluetooth Volume is automatically turned on in most Android devices, so unless you’ve already messed with the settings, it’s likely already enabled. If you’re currently connected to a Bluetooth device, you will need to disconnect it before changing these settings. Absolute Bluetooth Volume is very useful, but only if your Bluetooth device can handle it. It offers much better audio control than Bluetooth would otherwise be able to on an Android phone, and it can even increase audio quality. If you aren’t having any issues with your Bluetooth accessories, keep Absolute Bluetooth Volume as is. But if it’s causing problems, now you know how to disable it.

Next: Pixel 6a Vs. Pixel 6

Source: AOSP

Original Article:

Continue Reading


Is the Green Mile Based on a True Story? the Answer Is Complicated

Katelyn Bailey



The Green Mile follows the imprisonment and execution of Michael Clarke Duncan’s John Coffey, but when it comes to whether or not The Green Mile is based on a true story, the answer is complicated. The fantasy-infused drama introduces a group of prison guards – including Paul Edgecomb (Tom Hanks) – who work on death row in a Louisiana penitentiary, nicknamed “The Green Mile.” Edgecomb tells his story as an older man looking back on the movie’s events. In his younger days, Paul was tough, as his job required, but he was also ethical. He didn’t believe in pushing the psyches of men who were already stressed about their impending demises any more than necessary.

The dreary routine of the prison was shaken up when an inmate named John Coffey arrived. Though innocent, he was a black man who had been convicted of raping and murdering two young white girls. Since The Green Mile, based on a book by Stephen King, takes place in the southern U.S. during the Great Depression, it’s immediately clear the gentle giant didn’t stand a chance of winning back his freedom or saving his life. The film’s fantasy aspect kicks into gear when both guards and people learn that Coffey has the miraculous ability to heal other people from ailments and injuries. Unfortunately, neither his innocence nor his supernatural talent was enough to save him from an emotionally devastating death via the electric chair.

Related: Ratched’s Stephen King Easter Egg Explained

While The Green Mile isn’t a true story, the Stephen King novel does draw from real-life events. Stephen King doesn’t often take on biographical works, but there’s enough evidence to suggest that one particular individual inspires The Green Mile’s story. It’s hard to believe that the caring John Coffey could face the horrors that he did in prison, because he was clearly innocent of his accused crimes. Nonetheless, the Green Mile chronicles this and does a harrowing job of depicting an innocent and abused man on death row. Here’s whether or not The Green Mile is based on a true story and its real-life inspirations explained.

Since this kind of tragic, unfair derailing and taking of a life has been documented in great quantities over the years, the question naturally arises as to whether The Green Mile is based on a true story or not. Technically, the answer is “no.” The movie is an adaptation of the 1996 Stephen King novel The Green Mile. That said, there are certainly strong parallels to the real-life George Stinney case. The aforementioned youth was a 14-year-old boy convicted of killing, and possibly sexually assaulting, two young girls in 1944. There are differences; Stinney was from South Carolina instead of Louisiana, and the film’s plot is set a decade before the events of his case. But, there are additional similarities between him and John Coffey. Despite being a minor, Stinney was also executed by the electric chair the same year of his arrest and trial, and his innocence of the crime came into question too many years too late.

John Coffey was portrayed in director Frank Darabont’s 1999 King adaptation, and like The Green Mile’s story, Stinney seems to have been innocent of his alleged crimes. In 2014, a South Carolina circuit court judge vacated his past conviction – meaning his previous guilty verdict was void. It was determined that Stinney’s Sixth Amendment rights, which pertain to criminal prosecution, had been violated. Not only that, but the judge believed it was likely the boy’s confession had been coerced, which should have made it inadmissible in court. Like Stephen King’s book, The Green Mile, George Stinney never had a chance; an all-white jury decided his fate, and his so-called counsel provided him with barely any defense.

While not a true story, The Green Mile is based on a book. The heart and plot of the book remain intact for the movie adaptation. However, some changes were made to prevent the film from being “too sad” (if that can be believed). The Green Mile book’s ending is actually more depressing. After Elaine dies, readers are made privy to the fact that Paul’s wife Jan died in his arms after a tragic bus accident. This final blow is not featured in the movie, as it only would’ve brought out more waterworks than necessary. Another figure who died in the book (again) is the mouse Mr. Jingles, who passed shortly before Elaine. Finally, one of the most heinous villains in the novel doesn’t appear in The Green Mile film adaptation. The character Brad Dolan is an attendant at the nursing home, who shares many traits with the guard Percy. He lets loose on the older Paul quite often and, thankfully, was cut from the movie.

Related: Why The Shawshank Redemption Hid Its Stephen King Connection

Beautiful and horrifyingly tragic, The Green Mile is on par with films like the Matthew McConaughey-starring legal drama A Time To Kill and 1988’s Mississippi Burning. Though The Green Mile isn’t based on a true story, it’s another movie that chronicles a small snapshot of the widely documented failings of U.S. law enforcement. In addition, it points the finger at legal systems in racialized cases during this time period.

Next: What Stephen King Thinks Of Every Adaptation (Movies & TV Shows)

Original Source:

Continue Reading