Connect with us

Lifestyle

Ozark: 6 Times We Felt Bad for Charlotte (& 6 Times We Hated Her)

Katelyn Bailey

Published

on

Content Warning: The following article contains spoilers for the Netflix series Ozark and discussions of suicide and gun violence.

Charlotte Byrde, portrayed by Sofia Hublitz, has evolved from the angry teen of the first season to one of Ozark‘s most reasonable characters. While she doesn’t approve of her family’s money laundering business like her brother Jonah, she still finds a way to accommodate them.

RELATED: 7 Times We Felt Bad For Ruth On Ozark (& 7 Times We Hated Her)

She always finds herself in the middle of trouble, whether caused by herself or her endless teen adventures. Transitioning from the proud city girl into a natural Ozark has seen Charlotte make lots of mistakes as well as some hard decisions along the way. Throughout her transformation, fans couldn’t help but hate her sometimes.

Updated on April 28th, 2022, by Hannah Saab: Charlotte Byrde continues to be one of the most polarizing characters on Ozark, likely second only to her mother, Wendy Byrde. Her most recent actions on the show have fans asking why she’s taking her parents’ side over Jonah’s, who understandably feels betrayed by his big sister. With the finale just around the corner, it’s the ideal time to look back at Charlotte’s most controversial decisions and lowest points in the crime-drama series.

Moving from Chicago to Missouri was definitely a hard choice for Charlotte. She found it hard to fit in at the Ozarks as everyone she met seemed to be either too hostile to her or lie to her. Her lamentations about how she missed her life and friends in Chicago were also disheartening to hear. The feeling became worse when it became clear she was dealing with a broken family.

She found out that her mom had cheated on her dad and that the whole family had moved to the Ozarks to launder money for the cartel. The pressure seemed too much for her and looked like she would be the first member of the Byrde family to give up, but she got through it.

The whole ordeal of having to leave her dad behind was hard for Charlotte. She had only started getting settled in the Ozarks and wasn’t ready for another run to nowhere. When they met Marty’s private investigator and were handed their fake IDs, Charlotte was negatively affected by the decision.

RELATED: Wendy’s Transformation Over The Seasons Of Ozark (In Pictures)

She managed to convince Wendy that the family was better off when they stuck together but not without the emotions involved. The entire scene of the three of them hugging and crying before driving back to the Ozarks at the end of the second season was hard to watch.

Having to defend themselves against a cartel assassin is not anything young children should experience, but it’s unfortunately what happens to the Byrdes when Garcia invades their home. Charlotte is always the least aggressive and wasn’t prepared for the danger, unlike Jonah, who was already armed with a shotgun.

When Buddy came and saved the day, Charlotte seemed to have handled it bravely, but it was still a scary event for her. It seemed like she was the one likely to die in the incident considering her irresponsibility in the days preceding the attack.

Zach’s role in Ozark may have been brief, but it left a lasting impression on Charlotte and fans of the show. It helped her realize things worked differently in the Ozarks compared to the big city. His sudden departure was that “I told you so!” moment for Wyatt, but it wasn’t the type one would smile about. Zach was the type of guy any smart girl could see for who he was from the beginning. However, it was only her first time, so viewers have to give her the benefit of the doubt.

She was very broken after the ordeal, which is why she hasn’t had another relationship with anyone since Zach left. The encounter may have, however, helped make her more sensible and less trusting, which, in her case, is actually a good thing.

Charlotte has had lots of bad times on the show, but this was the worst for her. She was going through a tough transition, but no one around her seemed to notice. Marty and Wendy were both too focused on cartel business to notice her troubled state. Losing Wyatt as a friend left the ever-occupied Jonah as her only companion, meaning she was alone during this tough time.

RELATED: The 10 Best Characters In Ozark

Charlotte came uncomfortably close to giving up, and it was almost too painful to watch her sink to the depths of the lake. She thankfully realizes it’s not that deep, which helps snap her out of the terrible moment. It’s her lowest point in the series so far, and audiences are probably glad she’s moved past that stage in her life.

Charlotte and Wyatt’s relationship in Ozark served as her escape from that town that she hated. With Wyatt, she could goof around and pretend they were just a pair of normal teenagers having fun. This is why it was so disappointing for her when Wyatt reacted badly to an expensive book she stole for him.

Wyatt makes it clear that Langmores like him can’t be with privileged individuals like her, which understandably hurts Charlotte. She thought she was doing something funny and kind for her close friend, which is likely what viewers thought as well.

Charlotte’s story arc was off to a bad start when she abandoned the motel room and indirectly caused millions of cartel money to fall into the Langmores’ hands. She was so angry at her family for forcing her to uproot her life in Chicago that she forgot it was the whole family’s life her dad was trying to save.

She easily fell for Wyatt’s tricks by joining the boat ride and abandoning the hotel room with all the cartel money inside. When Ruth Langmore stole the money, it felt like the end of the road for the Byrdes. If Marty hadn’t sought the Sherrif’s help to track down the Langmores, the cartel would have come for them.

Having money launderers for parents and living in fear of a cartel is not the best way to grow up. However, considering the love and effort Marty and Wendy put in to keep the children safe, Charlotte’s decision was selfish.

Her emancipation would raise suspicion with the cartel, and it also meant she would tell the lawyer about her family’s illegal business, both of which meant someone would have to die. She also forced Wendy into a tight agreement of going to see a therapist, a decision that got the supporting character Sue killed.

Living with the Byrde family is never easy, which is why fans try to understand Charlotte’s fears, but she tends to overdo it. When she bought a van and ran away without telling her parents, she put everyone in more danger. Unlike her brother Jonah who prefers finding a solution to family problems, Charlotte seemed to see fleeing as the best option.

RELATED: The Best Thing Each Main Character Did In Ozark

She caused a frenzy in the house as the whole family feared for her, and Marty feared the wrath of the cartel in case they assumed he was trying to hide his family. When compared to her brother’s patience and stability at that time, viewers couldn’t help but hate her.

It was easy to see that Charlotte and Zach’s encounter in Ozark would end badly, but that didn’t stop fans from hating Charlotte for how quickly she fell for his cheesy lines. She was desperate to escape her situation, and a reminder of her life in the city just happened to appear in front of her.

It’s not her fault that he took advantage of her situation, but that doesn’t make viewers any less frustrated about the whole thing. She developed feelings for and slept with a guy that didn’t care about her at all. It’s a common but painful mistake to make for teenagers.

Charlotte knows that her dad works for a cold-blooded murderer, so the worst thing she can do to him is to steal from his employer – she does so without thinking twice about it. Even though the amount didn’t get Marty into trouble with the cartel, it caused lots of problems.

First, she kept the money in the house, which was eventually found by the FBI. She also used the same money to buy the van she used in her attempt to run away from home. Stealing the money also proved that Charlotte just doesn’t trust her father that much with her security. It’s an annoying mistake, and one that thankfully doesn’t happen again after that.

Over the past four seasons, it has become clear that Charlotte is becoming more like her cutthroat and cunning mom. Perhaps the scene that underscores this transformation the most happens after Erin starts asking Charlotte questions about Helen, who has been missing for a while.

Charlotte not only comforts her over the phone but volunteers to go to Chicago, which her parents support. Viewers may have expected Charlotte to just be there to help her friend, but her intentions become obvious once she starts threatening Erin, implying that like Helen, the Byrdes can make her disappear. It’s a disturbing conversation that speaks volumes about how much Charlotte has changed, and not exactly for the better.

NEXT: 7 Times We Felt Bad For Wendy On Ozark (& 7 Times We Hated Her)

Source Here: screenrant.com

Lifestyle

John Krasinski Finally Breaks Silence After Doctor Strange 2 Cameo

Katelyn Bailey

Published

on

Contains Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness spoilers!

John Krasinski finally breaks his silence following his cameo appearance in Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness. The latest Marvel Studios movie to hit theaters released on May 6, and has quickly proven a hit at the box office, grossing over $700 million worldwide so far. Doctor Strange 2 reviews have been positive, though there are some elements that have dominated the conversation around the movie online.

One of those has been the movie’s approach to cameos, which, thanks to the prominence of the multiverse plotline, had been the subject of much fan speculation. In the Doctor Strange 2 Illuminati scene, one of the most popular fan theories ended up coming true, with Krasinski appearing as Earth-838’s version of Reed Richards, a.k.a. Mr. Fantastic. Since Marvel announced an MCU Fantastic Four movie was in development, viewers have been waiting for when the franchise would make take the first step towards introducing them, making this fancast-come-true a big moment for many audience members.

Related: Doctor Strange 2 Cast Guide: Every Marvel Character Who Appears

Now, Krasinski breaks his silence with his first tweet since Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness released. The actor remains extremely coy, however, revealing that he just wrapped on a movie and finally has some free time. He asks his followers if there’s anything out he should see, and a wink is heavily implied. Check out Krasinski’s tweet below:

Click here to see the original post

As happy as many were to finally see Reed Richards in an MCU movie, his 838 variant met a violent end at the hands of the Scarlet Witch, which has many questioning what Krasinski’s Doctor Strange 2 Mr. Fantastic cameo means the first. For many, bringing in an actor this big has to suggest he is intended to return in Fantastic Four, but given the nature of the multiverse, this is not necessarily the case. In Spider-Man: No Way Home, for example, the three Peter Parker variants are played by different actors, meaning this could have been Kevin Feige & Co. winking good at a popular fan-cast.

Bringing back Patrick Stewart to play Doctor Strange 2‘s Professor X in the same scene seems to support this, since the actor’s age and long history with the part would make it a surprise if he was intended to headline the MCU X-Men. However, given that all of the variants Doctor Strange and Wanda encountered were played by their respective MCU actors, the long-term potential remains a possibility, if not a certainty. Krasinski opted not to break the news with his first post-release tweet, but that fans are likely to keep a close eye on his feed from now on anyway.

Next: Doctor Strange In The Multiverse Of Madness Ending Explained (In Detail)

Source: John Krasinski/Twitter

Original Post: screenrant.com

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

Absolute Bluetooth Volume on Android Explained & How to Disable It

Katelyn Bailey

Published

on

Absolute Bluetooth Volume allows Android users to control both the volume of the Bluetooth device they’re connecting to and the volume of the phone with one volume control. This feature has been around since 2015, and it is likely already available on your phone. There are pros and cons to Absolute Bluetooth Volume, and there is also an easy way to turn it off.

Bluetooth is a useful feature in itself, although the need for better controls has become even greater in recent times with so many devices moving away from physical ports. This is particularly true when it comes to headphones, with the 3.5mm port becoming less common and forcing users to rely more heavily on wireless headphones. Absolute Bluetooth Volume was a long-awaited feature on Android devices. Prior to its inclusion in Android, Bluetooth devices required the user to control the volume of the accessory and the phone volume separately.

Related: Google’s Push For Tablet-Optimized Android Apps Is Too Little, Too Late

Absolute Bluetooth Volume is a feature that is available for devices running on Android 6.0 or later. According to the Android Open Source Project, it allows the phone to send audio information through the phone, edits that audio information to match the volume, and then controls the volume of the Bluetooth device to make sure accurate volume is achieved. While the source device can detect changes and change volume coming from the Android device, changes to the source device can also be shown in the volume controls on the Android device. Confused? Here’s what it all boils down to: If someone turns down the volume on a Bluetooth speaker/headphones while it’s connected to your phone, you’ll be able to see the new volume reflected in the controls of your phone.

Unfortunately, many Bluetooth-enabled devices aren’t designed to handle Absolute Bluetooth Volume. As such, some may encounter audio issues when Absolute Bluetooth Volume is enabled. If you find that your Bluetooth device is having volume problems when connected to your Android phone, disabling Absolute Bluetooth Volume might do the trick.

First, open the Settings app on your Android phone, scroll to the bottom of the page, and tap ‘System.’ Next, tap ‘Developer Options,’ scroll down the page, and look for the option titled, ‘Enable absolute volume.’ Tap that, and you’ll disable Absolute Bluetooth Volume on your Android device. If you ever find yourself wanting to re-enable Absolute Bluetooth Volume, follow these steps again to turn the feature back on.

Absolute Bluetooth Volume is automatically turned on in most Android devices, so unless you’ve already messed with the settings, it’s likely already enabled. If you’re currently connected to a Bluetooth device, you will need to disconnect it before changing these settings. Absolute Bluetooth Volume is very useful, but only if your Bluetooth device can handle it. It offers much better audio control than Bluetooth would otherwise be able to on an Android phone, and it can even increase audio quality. If you aren’t having any issues with your Bluetooth accessories, keep Absolute Bluetooth Volume as is. But if it’s causing problems, now you know how to disable it.

Next: Pixel 6a Vs. Pixel 6

Source: AOSP

Original Article: screenrant.com

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

Is the Green Mile Based on a True Story? the Answer Is Complicated

Katelyn Bailey

Published

on

The Green Mile follows the imprisonment and execution of Michael Clarke Duncan’s John Coffey, but when it comes to whether or not The Green Mile is based on a true story, the answer is complicated. The fantasy-infused drama introduces a group of prison guards – including Paul Edgecomb (Tom Hanks) – who work on death row in a Louisiana penitentiary, nicknamed “The Green Mile.” Edgecomb tells his story as an older man looking back on the movie’s events. In his younger days, Paul was tough, as his job required, but he was also ethical. He didn’t believe in pushing the psyches of men who were already stressed about their impending demises any more than necessary.

The dreary routine of the prison was shaken up when an inmate named John Coffey arrived. Though innocent, he was a black man who had been convicted of raping and murdering two young white girls. Since The Green Mile, based on a book by Stephen King, takes place in the southern U.S. during the Great Depression, it’s immediately clear the gentle giant didn’t stand a chance of winning back his freedom or saving his life. The film’s fantasy aspect kicks into gear when both guards and people learn that Coffey has the miraculous ability to heal other people from ailments and injuries. Unfortunately, neither his innocence nor his supernatural talent was enough to save him from an emotionally devastating death via the electric chair.

Related: Ratched’s Stephen King Easter Egg Explained

While The Green Mile isn’t a true story, the Stephen King novel does draw from real-life events. Stephen King doesn’t often take on biographical works, but there’s enough evidence to suggest that one particular individual inspires The Green Mile’s story. It’s hard to believe that the caring John Coffey could face the horrors that he did in prison, because he was clearly innocent of his accused crimes. Nonetheless, the Green Mile chronicles this and does a harrowing job of depicting an innocent and abused man on death row. Here’s whether or not The Green Mile is based on a true story and its real-life inspirations explained.

Since this kind of tragic, unfair derailing and taking of a life has been documented in great quantities over the years, the question naturally arises as to whether The Green Mile is based on a true story or not. Technically, the answer is “no.” The movie is an adaptation of the 1996 Stephen King novel The Green Mile. That said, there are certainly strong parallels to the real-life George Stinney case. The aforementioned youth was a 14-year-old boy convicted of killing, and possibly sexually assaulting, two young girls in 1944. There are differences; Stinney was from South Carolina instead of Louisiana, and the film’s plot is set a decade before the events of his case. But, there are additional similarities between him and John Coffey. Despite being a minor, Stinney was also executed by the electric chair the same year of his arrest and trial, and his innocence of the crime came into question too many years too late.

John Coffey was portrayed in director Frank Darabont’s 1999 King adaptation, and like The Green Mile’s story, Stinney seems to have been innocent of his alleged crimes. In 2014, a South Carolina circuit court judge vacated his past conviction – meaning his previous guilty verdict was void. It was determined that Stinney’s Sixth Amendment rights, which pertain to criminal prosecution, had been violated. Not only that, but the judge believed it was likely the boy’s confession had been coerced, which should have made it inadmissible in court. Like Stephen King’s book, The Green Mile, George Stinney never had a chance; an all-white jury decided his fate, and his so-called counsel provided him with barely any defense.

While not a true story, The Green Mile is based on a book. The heart and plot of the book remain intact for the movie adaptation. However, some changes were made to prevent the film from being “too sad” (if that can be believed). The Green Mile book’s ending is actually more depressing. After Elaine dies, readers are made privy to the fact that Paul’s wife Jan died in his arms after a tragic bus accident. This final blow is not featured in the movie, as it only would’ve brought out more waterworks than necessary. Another figure who died in the book (again) is the mouse Mr. Jingles, who passed shortly before Elaine. Finally, one of the most heinous villains in the novel doesn’t appear in The Green Mile film adaptation. The character Brad Dolan is an attendant at the nursing home, who shares many traits with the guard Percy. He lets loose on the older Paul quite often and, thankfully, was cut from the movie.

Related: Why The Shawshank Redemption Hid Its Stephen King Connection

Beautiful and horrifyingly tragic, The Green Mile is on par with films like the Matthew McConaughey-starring legal drama A Time To Kill and 1988’s Mississippi Burning. Though The Green Mile isn’t based on a true story, it’s another movie that chronicles a small snapshot of the widely documented failings of U.S. law enforcement. In addition, it points the finger at legal systems in racialized cases during this time period.

Next: What Stephen King Thinks Of Every Adaptation (Movies & TV Shows)

Original Source: screenrant.com

Continue Reading

Trending

EDLH.com