Connect with us


Absolute Bluetooth Volume on Android Explained & How to Disable It

Katelyn Bailey



Absolute Bluetooth Volume allows Android users to control both the volume of the Bluetooth device they’re connecting to and the volume of the phone with one volume control. This feature has been around since 2015, and it is likely already available on your phone. There are pros and cons to Absolute Bluetooth Volume, and there is also an easy way to turn it off.

Bluetooth is a useful feature in itself, although the need for better controls has become even greater in recent times with so many devices moving away from physical ports. This is particularly true when it comes to headphones, with the 3.5mm port becoming less common and forcing users to rely more heavily on wireless headphones. Absolute Bluetooth Volume was a long-awaited feature on Android devices. Prior to its inclusion in Android, Bluetooth devices required the user to control the volume of the accessory and the phone volume separately.

Related: Google’s Push For Tablet-Optimized Android Apps Is Too Little, Too Late

Absolute Bluetooth Volume is a feature that is available for devices running on Android 6.0 or later. According to the Android Open Source Project, it allows the phone to send audio information through the phone, edits that audio information to match the volume, and then controls the volume of the Bluetooth device to make sure accurate volume is achieved. While the source device can detect changes and change volume coming from the Android device, changes to the source device can also be shown in the volume controls on the Android device. Confused? Here’s what it all boils down to: If someone turns down the volume on a Bluetooth speaker/headphones while it’s connected to your phone, you’ll be able to see the new volume reflected in the controls of your phone.

Unfortunately, many Bluetooth-enabled devices aren’t designed to handle Absolute Bluetooth Volume. As such, some may encounter audio issues when Absolute Bluetooth Volume is enabled. If you find that your Bluetooth device is having volume problems when connected to your Android phone, disabling Absolute Bluetooth Volume might do the trick.

First, open the Settings app on your Android phone, scroll to the bottom of the page, and tap ‘System.’ Next, tap ‘Developer Options,’ scroll down the page, and look for the option titled, ‘Enable absolute volume.’ Tap that, and you’ll disable Absolute Bluetooth Volume on your Android device. If you ever find yourself wanting to re-enable Absolute Bluetooth Volume, follow these steps again to turn the feature back on.

Absolute Bluetooth Volume is automatically turned on in most Android devices, so unless you’ve already messed with the settings, it’s likely already enabled. If you’re currently connected to a Bluetooth device, you will need to disconnect it before changing these settings. Absolute Bluetooth Volume is very useful, but only if your Bluetooth device can handle it. It offers much better audio control than Bluetooth would otherwise be able to on an Android phone, and it can even increase audio quality. If you aren’t having any issues with your Bluetooth accessories, keep Absolute Bluetooth Volume as is. But if it’s causing problems, now you know how to disable it.

Next: Pixel 6a Vs. Pixel 6

Source: AOSP

Original Article:


John Krasinski Finally Breaks Silence After Doctor Strange 2 Cameo

Katelyn Bailey



Contains Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness spoilers!

John Krasinski finally breaks his silence following his cameo appearance in Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness. The latest Marvel Studios movie to hit theaters released on May 6, and has quickly proven a hit at the box office, grossing over $700 million worldwide so far. Doctor Strange 2 reviews have been positive, though there are some elements that have dominated the conversation around the movie online.

One of those has been the movie’s approach to cameos, which, thanks to the prominence of the multiverse plotline, had been the subject of much fan speculation. In the Doctor Strange 2 Illuminati scene, one of the most popular fan theories ended up coming true, with Krasinski appearing as Earth-838’s version of Reed Richards, a.k.a. Mr. Fantastic. Since Marvel announced an MCU Fantastic Four movie was in development, viewers have been waiting for when the franchise would make take the first step towards introducing them, making this fancast-come-true a big moment for many audience members.

Related: Doctor Strange 2 Cast Guide: Every Marvel Character Who Appears

Now, Krasinski breaks his silence with his first tweet since Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness released. The actor remains extremely coy, however, revealing that he just wrapped on a movie and finally has some free time. He asks his followers if there’s anything out he should see, and a wink is heavily implied. Check out Krasinski’s tweet below:

Click here to see the original post

As happy as many were to finally see Reed Richards in an MCU movie, his 838 variant met a violent end at the hands of the Scarlet Witch, which has many questioning what Krasinski’s Doctor Strange 2 Mr. Fantastic cameo means the first. For many, bringing in an actor this big has to suggest he is intended to return in Fantastic Four, but given the nature of the multiverse, this is not necessarily the case. In Spider-Man: No Way Home, for example, the three Peter Parker variants are played by different actors, meaning this could have been Kevin Feige & Co. winking good at a popular fan-cast.

Bringing back Patrick Stewart to play Doctor Strange 2‘s Professor X in the same scene seems to support this, since the actor’s age and long history with the part would make it a surprise if he was intended to headline the MCU X-Men. However, given that all of the variants Doctor Strange and Wanda encountered were played by their respective MCU actors, the long-term potential remains a possibility, if not a certainty. Krasinski opted not to break the news with his first post-release tweet, but that fans are likely to keep a close eye on his feed from now on anyway.

Next: Doctor Strange In The Multiverse Of Madness Ending Explained (In Detail)

Source: John Krasinski/Twitter

Original Post:

Continue Reading


Is the Green Mile Based on a True Story? the Answer Is Complicated

Katelyn Bailey



The Green Mile follows the imprisonment and execution of Michael Clarke Duncan’s John Coffey, but when it comes to whether or not The Green Mile is based on a true story, the answer is complicated. The fantasy-infused drama introduces a group of prison guards – including Paul Edgecomb (Tom Hanks) – who work on death row in a Louisiana penitentiary, nicknamed “The Green Mile.” Edgecomb tells his story as an older man looking back on the movie’s events. In his younger days, Paul was tough, as his job required, but he was also ethical. He didn’t believe in pushing the psyches of men who were already stressed about their impending demises any more than necessary.

The dreary routine of the prison was shaken up when an inmate named John Coffey arrived. Though innocent, he was a black man who had been convicted of raping and murdering two young white girls. Since The Green Mile, based on a book by Stephen King, takes place in the southern U.S. during the Great Depression, it’s immediately clear the gentle giant didn’t stand a chance of winning back his freedom or saving his life. The film’s fantasy aspect kicks into gear when both guards and people learn that Coffey has the miraculous ability to heal other people from ailments and injuries. Unfortunately, neither his innocence nor his supernatural talent was enough to save him from an emotionally devastating death via the electric chair.

Related: Ratched’s Stephen King Easter Egg Explained

While The Green Mile isn’t a true story, the Stephen King novel does draw from real-life events. Stephen King doesn’t often take on biographical works, but there’s enough evidence to suggest that one particular individual inspires The Green Mile’s story. It’s hard to believe that the caring John Coffey could face the horrors that he did in prison, because he was clearly innocent of his accused crimes. Nonetheless, the Green Mile chronicles this and does a harrowing job of depicting an innocent and abused man on death row. Here’s whether or not The Green Mile is based on a true story and its real-life inspirations explained.

Since this kind of tragic, unfair derailing and taking of a life has been documented in great quantities over the years, the question naturally arises as to whether The Green Mile is based on a true story or not. Technically, the answer is “no.” The movie is an adaptation of the 1996 Stephen King novel The Green Mile. That said, there are certainly strong parallels to the real-life George Stinney case. The aforementioned youth was a 14-year-old boy convicted of killing, and possibly sexually assaulting, two young girls in 1944. There are differences; Stinney was from South Carolina instead of Louisiana, and the film’s plot is set a decade before the events of his case. But, there are additional similarities between him and John Coffey. Despite being a minor, Stinney was also executed by the electric chair the same year of his arrest and trial, and his innocence of the crime came into question too many years too late.

John Coffey was portrayed in director Frank Darabont’s 1999 King adaptation, and like The Green Mile’s story, Stinney seems to have been innocent of his alleged crimes. In 2014, a South Carolina circuit court judge vacated his past conviction – meaning his previous guilty verdict was void. It was determined that Stinney’s Sixth Amendment rights, which pertain to criminal prosecution, had been violated. Not only that, but the judge believed it was likely the boy’s confession had been coerced, which should have made it inadmissible in court. Like Stephen King’s book, The Green Mile, George Stinney never had a chance; an all-white jury decided his fate, and his so-called counsel provided him with barely any defense.

While not a true story, The Green Mile is based on a book. The heart and plot of the book remain intact for the movie adaptation. However, some changes were made to prevent the film from being “too sad” (if that can be believed). The Green Mile book’s ending is actually more depressing. After Elaine dies, readers are made privy to the fact that Paul’s wife Jan died in his arms after a tragic bus accident. This final blow is not featured in the movie, as it only would’ve brought out more waterworks than necessary. Another figure who died in the book (again) is the mouse Mr. Jingles, who passed shortly before Elaine. Finally, one of the most heinous villains in the novel doesn’t appear in The Green Mile film adaptation. The character Brad Dolan is an attendant at the nursing home, who shares many traits with the guard Percy. He lets loose on the older Paul quite often and, thankfully, was cut from the movie.

Related: Why The Shawshank Redemption Hid Its Stephen King Connection

Beautiful and horrifyingly tragic, The Green Mile is on par with films like the Matthew McConaughey-starring legal drama A Time To Kill and 1988’s Mississippi Burning. Though The Green Mile isn’t based on a true story, it’s another movie that chronicles a small snapshot of the widely documented failings of U.S. law enforcement. In addition, it points the finger at legal systems in racialized cases during this time period.

Next: What Stephen King Thinks Of Every Adaptation (Movies & TV Shows)

Original Source:

Continue Reading


Batman Begins: All 5 Villains in Nolan’s Movie | Screen Rant

Katelyn Bailey



Batman Begins, the first film in Christopher Nolan’s Dark Knight Trilogy, featured multiple villains for Gotham City’s protector to fight. Every new incarnation of Batman, whether live-action or animated, tends to at least flashback to the night Thomas and Martha Wayne were murdered, setting in motion the events that led their son Bruce to use his family fortune to fight crime. While The Batman was more subtle about who killed the Waynes, Batman Begins identifies Joe Chill, and many other antagonists come out to play. Some of these Batman villains even managed to keep their roots all the way to the third film, The Dark Knight Rises, in the form of Talia al Ghul, Ra’s al Ghul’s daughter.

While 2005’s Batman Begins depicted the death of Bruce Wayne’s parents, it also did something that hadn’t yet been done on the big screen: showcase the early years of Batman. With Batman Begins, people finally got to see Bruce’s time toughening himself up by willfully entering into dangerous locations and situations, then subsequently learning the brutal techniques of the League of Shadows. The Dark Knight Trilogy then followed Batman through two more movies as he took on Two-Face, The Joker, Catwoman, and Bane. The most recent Batman villains showcased on screen were in Matt Reeves’ The Batman, and the movie stretched out to include famous supervillains like the Penguin and the Riddler.

Related: Batman Begins: How Long Bruce Wayne Trained To Become The Dark Knight

Batman Begins‘ use of villains that had never before been depicted in a live-action movie gave the film a feeling of freshness. Ra’s al Ghul and The Scarecrow had yet to be featured on the big screen, and the Batman villains were given a proper introduction in the Christopher Nolan movie. This choice made sense, given the plot, as this still-developing version of Batman wasn’t quite ready for a signature foe like The Joker. Here’s the full roster of Batman Begins villains that Christian Bale’s Batman battled in his first Nolan outing.

Ra’s al Ghul was first introduced to the world of DC Comics back in 1971, and has been a consistent thorn in Batman’s side ever since, along with several other DC heroes. In Batman Begins, the villain Ra’s is played by Liam Neeson. Although, that’s revealed in a third-act twist. Up until then, Bruce had thought a decoy, played by Ken Watanabe, was Ra’s and had been killed when the League of Shadows’ temple had burned down.

Near the end of Batman Begins, Batman confronts the villain on Gotham’s monorail train, preventing him from releasing Scarecrow’s fear toxin into the city’s water supply. As is usual for the Caped Crusader, he refuses to kill Ra’s personally, but allows him to die when the train crashes. Many felt that action was out of character for Batman, as his established code probably should’ve compelled him to save Ra’s life instead of allowing him to be killed.

The Scarecrow is one of Batman’s oldest foes, first appearing on the pages of DC Comics all the way back in 1941, and famously uses fear to torment and get the upper hand on his opponents. The Batman Begins villain, Crane (played by 28 Days Later‘s Cillian Murphy), is a psychopharmacologist working as the head of Arkham Asylum. The problem is, Crane is even more insane than most of the patients in his care, and is utterly devoid of ethics.

Related: Batman Begins: How Scarecrow’s Fear Gas Works (Is It Really Possible?)

Crane conspires with the other Batman Begins villain Ra’s al Ghul, and the League of Shadows to try and destroy Gotham City by releasing his fear toxin straight into the water supply. Batman can prevent that mission from succeeding, but not without getting a taste of the toxin himself, and losing The Narrows to chaos. Unlike Ra’s, The Scarecrow survives the film, making amusing cameos in 2008’s The Dark Knight and 2012’s The Dark Knight Rises.

Batman Begins villain Carmine “The Roman” Falcone is the top Mafia boss in Gotham City, controlling the city’s non-supervillain criminal underworld. The character first appeared in DC Comics back in 1986. Played by Michael Clayton‘s Tom Wilkinson in Batman Begins (and John Turturro in The Batman), Falcone played a vital role in Bruce Wayne’s eventual evolution into Batman, sparing his life after Bruce confronted him solely to illustrate the level of power he truly wields in the city.

The Batman villain happily teamed up with Scarecrow and Ra’s al Ghul to smuggle in needed ingredients for their plan to unleash fear toxin on Gotham’s residents, in exchange for Crane using his influence as head of Arkham to get Falcone’s henchmen ruled insane and not sent to prison. After Batman orchestrates Falcone’s capture by police, though, the don tries to blackmail Crane, and quickly realizes why that was a terrible decision.

He may not get much to do in Batman Begins, but the villain Victor Zsasz is actually one of the deadliest in the world of DC, even without superpowers. Introduced in 1992, Zsasz is a serial killer who loves his work and gets off on torturing his victims. In some portrayals, he’s also sometimes an assassin for or right-hand man to a bigger bad guy. Zsasz is a true psychopath, with no redeeming qualities and infamously carves a mark onto his body for every kill.

Related: Why Batman Rarely Uses Batarangs In The Dark Knight Trilogy

The Batman Begins villain, who in the film is an assassin for Carmine Falcone, is put on trial, only to be ruled insane thanks to Jonathan Crane. He’s sent to Arkham, but later breaks out, and attempts to attack Rachel Dawes during the chaos in The Narrows. Thankfully, Batman can save her. Interestingly, promotional materials for The Dark Knight revealed that Zsasz remained at large, which certainly wasn’t good for anyone in Gotham.

Joe Chill is – at least in most depictions of Batman’s origin story — a mugger who shoots and kills Bruce Wayne’s parents Thomas and Martha, in an alley outside of a movie theater. He first appeared in DC Comics back in 1939. In most versions, Chill is a simple lowlife hood looking to rob a wealthy couple, and there’s no ulterior motive for his actions. This works well, giving Batman a reason to hate all criminals, petty or otherwise.

The Batman Begins villain, Chill (played by 3 From Hell‘s Richard Brake), is convicted of murdering the Waynes, and serves 14 years in prison before flipping on his cellmate, who happens to be Carmine Falcone. This was a dumb move, as Falcone’s assassins kill him immediately after Chill gets parole. That act angers Bruce, who had planned to kill Chill himself and get revenge for his parents. Thankfully, that didn’t happen, and Batman was ultimately born.

The role of Carmine Falcone is already taken by John Turturro, but here are the rest of the Batman Begins villains who could appear in The Batman — and who could play them. In the case of Ra’s al Ghul, some popular choices include Mads Mikkelsen and John Hamm. The former actor has an illustrious career in playing villains, and could definitely take on the role of Batman’s mentor turned supervillain. In addition, he already has supervillain experience, as he played the titular villain in Dr. Strange. While John Hamm seems like the stranger choice, he’s already shown his acting chops in Baby Driver as a murderous criminal. Hamm’s iteration of Ra’s could give The Batman villain a grittier and more realistic feel, which is emblematic of the new Batman movies’ tone.

Related: The Batman: How Pattinson’s Salary Compares To Bale For Batman Begins

Cillian Murphy could always reprise the role of Scarecrow. However, studios will likely pick another actor, and what better choice than Harry Melling. Melling got his start in the Harry Potter series as bully Dudley Dursley and then proved that he had enough creep factor to portray Dr. Crane in The Devil All the Time. A younger Scarecrow would be necessary for The Batman villain, given the timeline of the universe, and Mellings’ young Dr. Crane would be an eerie one. An obvious choice for Joe Chill would be Breaking Bad‘s Aaron Paul (who played Jesse Pinkman). The actor could bring a more complex characterization of the thug, while still maintaining the integrity of the role. Finally, Victor Zsasz could be played by either Bruce Willis or James McAvoy, depending on the age that they would want the character to be. Willis would bring his long-standing experience to the part, playing Zsasz with cold-blooded precision and fitting right in with the tone of the new films. James McAvoy could bring something new to the character, taking an unsympathetic serial killer and coloring him with a tone that’s truer to real life than previous iterations.

While Bane and the Joker are the most obvious choices, Aaron Eckhart’s Two-Face was a near-perfect Batman villain. His character arc on screen was a sight to behold, going from righteous DA to convincing supervillain in a short span of time, and truly letting his character drive his conflicted but nefarious actions. While a second antagonist for The Dark Knight, Two-Face even managed to outshine the late Heath Ledger’s Joker at times. His origins in the movie only added to the villain’s arc and motivations, as he eventually lurched over to the dark side. Ra’s al Ghul was another great Batman villain. He was charismatic, caring, and convincing as Batman’s mentor in Batman Begins, and the flip to villain was a startling one that set the tone for the series beautifully.

Next: The Batman: Every Character Who Also Appeared In The Dark Knight Trilogy


Continue Reading